The Regulatory Impact Infrastructure for MENA.

ProximaReg turns regulatory change into structured obligations, measurable business impact and actionable compliance workflows.

Illustration in Morocco

From a published provision to a business impact

SOURCE

Bank Al-MaghribCirculaire 14/G/2013Article 4as of 2016-06-10

Les établissements sont tenus de respecter, sur base individuelle et consolidée, les exigences minimales ci-après : le montant des fonds propres de base doit, à tout moment, être au moins égal à 8 % des risques pondérés ;

OBLIGATION
Obligation
Common Equity Tier 1 ≥ 8% of risk-weighted assets
Previously
5.5% · version 2014-01-01
Applies to
Établissements de crédit · individual and consolidated basis
Evidence
LS · legal source · art/4 · 25606d5f446b…
IMPACT

Compliance Impact Center3 internal procedures · Finance · Risk · Regulatory Reporting

Real text published by Bank Al-Maghrib · internal mapping illustrated on a sample organization

Regulatory teams are always reacting.

The regulation keeps changing. Compliance teams struggle to keep up.

In Morocco for example, more than 5,000 texts reach the Bulletin officiel every year, 28% more than four years ago. Most of them concern someone else. One — circulaire 1/W/2016 — amended seven articles of the own-funds rulebook and raised every minimum capital requirement by 2.5 points. Reading the flow is not the problem. Knowing which line changes what for your institution, before the deadline, is.

5,000+texts published in the Bulletin officiel every year+28% between 2020 and 2024source: SGG

Publication timeline

  1. 2013-08-13Circulaire 14/G/2013 · fonds propres des établissements de créditCircular
  2. 2014-06-05Arrêté 217-14 · homologation · Ministre de l’économie et des financesOrder
  3. 2015-05-21Bulletin officiel n° 6362 · publicationOfficial journal
  4. 2016-06-10Circulaire 1/W/2016 · modifiant et complétant la circulaire 14/G/20137 articles amended · 1 added (article 5 bis)Amendment
  5. 2016-09-20Arrêté 2805-16 · homologationOrder
  6. 2018-04-19Bulletin officiel n° 6666 · publication de l’arrêté d’homologationOfficial journal
  7. 2021-03-04Version consolidée · article 11 bis ajouté par la circulaire 2/W/2021 · article 9 modifiéAmendment
  8. —Homologation, publication au BO, entrée en vigueur · à confirmerUnknown

From days of analysis to seconds of structured impact

DaysSeconds.

From days of regulatory analysis to seconds of structured impact. From reactive compliance to anticipation.

Up to 80% of analysis time savedestimate

Compliance Impact Center

Meet the Compliance Impact Center.

This is where regulatory change becomes business impact. Six steps. One continuous line from regulatory source to business decision — followed here on a real regulatory case.

Bank Al-Maghrib · Circulaire 14/G/2013Fonds propres des établissements de crédit

MA3 versions2 change eventsStep 1 / 6

Step 1 · Monitoring

What changed in our regulatory perimeter?

NEW DETECTION · Bank Al-Maghrib

Circulaire 14/G/2013 relative aux fonds propres des établissements de crédit — modifiée par la circulaire 1/W/2016.

Impact level
Critical
Versions tracked
3
Change events
2
Domain
Own funds · solvency

Normally: someone finds the publication and works out whether it matters. Here: the change is detected on a text already under watch, with its impact level and next recommended step.

Step 2 · Analysis

What exactly changed in the text?

Article 42014-01-01→2016-06-10

— Common Equity Tier 1 must, at all times, be at least equal to 5.5% 8% of risk-weighted assets;

Article 5 bis — added · countercyclical capital buffer

Articles amended
7
Article added
1
Consolidated versions
3
Source
1/W/2016, art. 1–2

Normally: read two versions side by side. Here: consolidated versions compared article by article, against the amending instruction as published in the Bulletin officiel. The extract is shown in English; the text itself is published in French.

Step 3 · Assessment

What does it require — and how serious is it?

Maintain Common Equity Tier 1 at or above 8% of risk-weighted assets, at all times — up from 5.5%. Impact on the internal framework: Critical.

  • Internal controlsCritical
  • Regulatory reportingHigh
  • Audit trailMedium

LS requirement · legal sourceBI domains · business inference

Normally: a memo written by hand. Here: an executive synthesis, with the legal requirement kept apart from the business interpretation.

Step 4 · Internal mapping

What does it affect in our organization?

Sample internal procedures — illustrative, not a real institution.

  • Own funds calculation policyCriticalFinance · Art. 4 · amendedTo assess
  • Capital buffer monitoring and escalationCriticalRisk · Art. 5 bis · addedTo assess
  • Regulatory reporting mapping for own funds deductionsHighRegulatory Reporting · Art. 11 bis · Art. 9To assess

Normally: weeks of interviews to find which procedures are touched. Here: each changed article is mapped to the internal procedures and the department that owns them — business inference, to be assessed.

Step 5 · Remediation

What needs to happen — and who owns it?

Sample remediation plan — illustrative.

  1. 1Review capital ratio monitoring and limit escalation · Article 4Financecritical
  2. 2Map countercyclical buffer governance · Article 5 bisRiskcritical
  3. 3Check software-asset deduction in reporting templates · Articles 11 bis, 9Regulatory Reportinghigh

Due dates · to be set with each ownerEvidence required per action · audit trail

Normally: a spreadsheet nobody trusts. Here: a remediation plan with owners, priorities and the evidence each action must produce.

Step 6 · Committee pack

Can we defend the conclusion?

Sample committee note — illustrative.

Proposed decisions

  1. Confirm business owners for capital ratio and buffer monitoring impact assessment.
  2. Validate whether software-asset deduction treatment requires procedure or reporting-template updates.
  3. Request legal confirmation of the 2021 homologation and entry-into-force data before production use.

Legal trace retainedURI + content hash on every legal referenceUnknown data kept « À confirmer »

Normally: the reasoning lives in someone’s inbox. Here: a decision-ready note in which every proposed decision keeps its line back to the regulator’s text. Read it backwards ↓

From step 6, read backwards

Every conclusion stays connected to its source.

ProximaReg does not just produce an answer — it keeps the reasoning that led to it. Start from the decision proposed to your committee and walk it back: the internal procedure it touches, the obligation behind it, the article that carries that obligation, the text that published the article, the regulator that issued it. Nothing is summarized away, so you can show where a conclusion comes from — to your committee, your auditors or your supervisor.

  1. DECISIONConfirm business owners for capital ratio and buffer monitoring impact assessment.Committee pack · §7 · illustrative example
  2. IMPACTOwn funds calculation policy · Finance · CriticalInternal mapping · our reading of your procedures

Where the source is silent — an entry-into-force date, a modifying text number — ProximaReg says À confirmer rather than filling the gap. Nothing is disconnected from the source.

Coverage

Built for MENA regulation.

Not a geographic filter — a regulatory model built from the region’s own supervisors, publication formats, homologation practices and languages. Coverage grows by country, regulator and topic, and appears here only once it is connected in the platform.

MAStructured & versioned

Morocco

  • Bank Al-MaghribCredit institutions · corpus of 182 texts in the coverage registerStructured & versioned
  • Bulletin officiel · SGGOfficial publication streamMonitored
  • AMMCCapital marketsNext
  • ACAPSInsuranceNext

AEStructured & versioned

United Arab Emirates

  • DFSADIFC · versioned rulebookStructured & versioned
  • CBUAEBankingMonitored
  • FSRAADGMMonitored
  • VARAVirtual assetsMonitored
  • CMACapital markets · formerly SCAMonitored

International watch

Standard setters and sanctions authorities monitored as a separate layer, alongside MENA coverage:SEC · FinCEN · OFAC · ECB · ESMA · FSB

Technology

One infrastructure, from source to impact.

Not three products. A single pipeline in which each layer feeds the next and keeps the reference to the one before — operated by specialized AI agents, each bounded by what the source actually says.

  1. Regulatory sources

    Official publications: circulars, amending texts, homologation orders, bulletins.

  2. Infrastructure layer · Source Structuring Agents

    Scanned PDFs, hybrid publications, multi-column layouts, tables and atypical structures are normalized before any analysis. Invisible, and what makes the data reliable.

  3. Regulatory state · Consolidation

    Reconstruct the applicable text through versions and amendments — three consolidated versions on the case above, each hashed.

  4. Structured obligations · Obligation Detection

    Identify and structure requirements — entity, requirement, threshold, applicability — anchored to their provision.

  5. Business impact · Legal Knowledge Graph

    Connect regulations, obligations, entities and internal procedures, so a change in the text resolves into the parts of the organization it touches.

  6. Agentic AI, kept on a short leash: agents read, structure, consolidate and compare — always on the published text, and every output stays attached to the provision it came from. Where the source says nothing, the agent flags it instead of filling the gap.

Proof

A real regulator. A real text. A real analysis.

Product proof

Bank Al-Maghrib · Circulaire 14/G/2013 · fonds propres

Consolidated versions
3
Change events analyzed
2
Articles amended by 1/W/2016
7 + 1
Legal references with URI + hash
all
See the case in the walkthrough

Coverage proof

Measured figures only

Published figures are internal measurements, dated. Nothing here is estimated.

acts extracted from 75 Bulletins officiels
1 717measured 2026-08-17
texts in the BAM coverage register
182measured 2026-09-09
authorities connected (6 MENA, 6 international)
12measured 2026-09-14

Market proof

Programs and recognition

Institutions, partners and publications appear here only with authorization for public use.

  • Winner — CAP’AI Reverse by BK 2026

    BMCE Capital (Bank of Africa Group) · 3 winners out of 62 applications · the only winner on the compliance perimeter.

  • Morocco FinTech Center — Fintech Booster

    Demo Day of 30/06/2026 · 21 startups out of 117 applications.

Team

Fifteen years in RegTech. Built from experience, not theory.

A focused team with deep regulatory technology experience. ProximaReg was built from years of working with regulatory data, compliance workflows and the operational complexity of regulated organizations.

  • Portrait of Ismaël Ziani, founder and CEO of ProximaReg

    FOUNDER · CEO

    Ismaël Ziani

    Fifteen years building regulatory and legal technology.

  • Portrait of Galeran Dejardin, CFO advisor to ProximaReg

    ADVISORY · CFO

    Galeran Dejardin

    General management and finance.

  • Portrait of Professor Georges-André Silber, CTO advisor to ProximaReg

    ADVISORY · CTO

    Pr. Georges-André Silber

    Teaching lead in NLP and large language models.

Enterprise trust

Built for decisions that must be defensible.

Regulated organizations need to know how a conclusion was reached, where the data lives and who can see it. We publish what we can demonstrate — nothing else.

Traceability
Every conclusion can be walked back to the article, and to the version of it that applied
Evidence labels
Legal source, business inference and demo assumption are distinguished
You keep the last word
The platform does the reading and flags what the source does not settle; your team decides
Versioned analyses
Consolidated states and change events kept, not overwritten
Security and hosting
Documented at the demo, published here once demonstrable
Data protection
Residency, retention and processing covered at the demo

See how ProximaReg maps regulatory change to your organization.